We review your AI system, how it's built, where it's used, and where failures would hurt most.

Our AI evaluation and system testing services help you launch LLM apps, RAG assistants, and AI agents that work reliably, then keep them accurate as models, prompts, and data change. We combine automated AI testing with expert human review, so you catch problems before your users do.



AI evaluation is the process of measuring how well an AI system performs against clear, agreed standards for accuracy, safety, and consistency. Unlike traditional software, AI can give a different answer to the same question each time. So one passing test proves little; quality has to be measured across many runs, real user scenarios, and edge cases.
Outputs vary. The same prompt can produce a correct answer today and a wrong one tomorrow.
Models and data drift. Provider model updates, new documents, and changing user behavior slowly shift quality.
Small changes break things quietly. A prompt tweak or model swap can fix one issue and create three others nobody notices.
We score your model's answers for accuracy, relevance, completeness, and tone against criteria built around your users and use case, across repeated runs, not one-off spot checks.
We assess your AI applications for security weaknesses, including prompt injection, sensitive data exposure, insecure integrations, and access-control gaps. Our testing identifies vulnerabilities across your LLMs, RAG pipelines, and AI agents, helping you reduce security risks and protect your systems, data, and users.
We check that your assistant retrieves the right documents and answers only from them, catching confident but unsupported answers before they reach customers.
We test how your agents plan, call tools, complete multi-step tasks, and recover from errors, so autonomous workflows finish correctly and stay within their limits.
We probe your system with prompt injection, jailbreak attempts, and edge cases to find data leaks and biased responses.
We re-run your evaluation suite on every prompt, model, or data update and monitor live performance, so quality drift is flagged before it becomes a support ticket.

Reliable AI features, copilots, and agents that ship faster without breaking.
Accurate, auditable AI answers where errors carry financial and compliance risk.
Safe, grounded responses that never go beyond what your sources support.
Support bots and shopping assistants that stay on-brand and correct.
Tutors and training assistants that give accurate, age-appropriate answers.
Knowledge assistants that cite the right documents and protect sensitive data.

Public benchmarks don't reflect your users. We build test sets from your real queries, documents, and edge cases, and define what a "good" answer means for your product before testing starts.
We set up automated scoring, including LLM-as-judge checks, inside your CI/CD workflow, so every release is tested at scale without slowing your team down.
Automated scores miss nuance. Our reviewers check tone, context, and domain accuracy, and calibrate the automated checks so they stay trustworthy over time.
We compare models, prompts, and retrieval setups side by side on quality, latency, and cost, so you can choose the right option with evidence instead of guesswork.
We trace failures to their root cause, whether it's the prompt, retrieval, data, or model, and turn findings into clear fixes that improve performance with each release.

Digital product managers and scrum product owners with extensive expertise in diverse industries, including banking, healthcare, e-commerce, and more.
Senior software engineers, coders, and architects proficient in a wide array of technologies and frameworks.
Highly skilled business consultants and strategy and operations specialists are adept at navigating various business types and sizes.
Seasoned QA engineers proficient in manual and automated testing, along with other quality assurance techniques, ensure the highest product quality and reliability standards.
Talented UX designers are dedicated to creating seamless and user-friendly experiences, enhancing the overall design and usability of your digital products.

We review your AI system, how it's built, where it's used, and where failures would hurt most.
We agree on measurable quality criteria and risk thresholds with your product and engineering teams.


We create evaluation datasets, automated checks, and human review guidelines tailored to your use case.
We run the evaluation, report what's failing and why, and prioritize fixes by impact.


We keep testing every update and tracking live performance, so quality improves after launch instead of drifting.
Partner with Whizzbridge's AI evaluation experts to test, monitor, and improve your LLM apps, RAG assistants, and AI agents. From your first evaluation baseline to ongoing regression testing and AI analysis, we help you launch with confidence and keep getting better after release.
Get in Touch
AI testing checks whether specific behaviors work, such as a tool call, a safety guardrail, or a known edge case. AI evaluation measures overall quality across many runs and scenarios against your success criteria. We combine both for a complete picture.
AI outputs vary, provider models change, and your data keeps growing. Each prompt or model update can quietly break answers that used to work. Ongoing regression testing and monitoring catch these issues before users do.
Yes. We evaluate LLM apps, RAG assistants, and AI agents built in-house or by other vendors, on any major model or provider. You keep full ownership of your models, data, and IP.
Both. Automated evaluation gives speed and coverage on every release. Expert human review handles nuance, domain accuracy, and tone, and keeps automated scoring calibrated.
A baseline evaluation typically takes a few weeks, depending on your system's complexity and how many use cases are in scope. Ongoing monitoring and regression testing then run alongside your release cycle.